[On "early pathologic anatomy" and "anatomy of medical structure": continuity or point of epistemological rupture?]

Vesalius. 2006 Jun;12(1):30-6.
[Article in French]

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyse the technical, conceptual and institutional changes from which, through macroscopic pathology, a new medical science (microscopic pathology) emerged. The "early" pathology was mainly implemented by the Ecole de Paris, at the beginning of the 19th century. After 1850, histo-pathology emerged, in German university institutes (which were separate buildings from the wards and from the dissecting rooms of the hospitals). The birth of histo-pathology is also linked with technical improvements in mass manufactured microscopes, with better techniques for fixing and staining histological samples and lastly, in (1848) withVirchow's cellular theory. Among French doctors, only one, the very famous physician Jean-Martin Charcot (1825-1893) was aware of these dramatic changes. Charcot wrote many texts which are testimonies of an epistemological rupture between two very different types of medicine, the old French "médecine d'hôpital" and the new "lab medicine", developed in German speaking countries and based on the microscope.

Publication types

  • Biography
  • English Abstract
  • Historical Article

MeSH terms

  • France
  • Germany
  • History, 19th Century
  • Microscopy / history
  • Pathology, Clinical / history*

Personal name as subject

  • Jean-Martin Charcot